:quality(85)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/infobae/GMIDVMLSUNERHC5HCWNA6DDUO4.jpg "Keiko Fujimori: Brazilian Supreme Court overturns Odebrecht evidence in cocktail case")
He Supremo Tribunal Federal (S.T.F) declared that credentials received from servers in Brazil were invalid Draucis Y My internet day bWhere are the settings? Otbrecht Registered Bribery, il Cocktail caseA process they blame Keiko Fujimori of Financial fraud, Criminal organization and other crimes.
Brazil's Supreme Court made the decision Jose Antonio Diaz Tofoli In a resolution declaring the plea of former minister and co-accused Fujimori Higuchi admissible, Jaime Yoshiyama Tanakawho sought to extend the effects of the resolution in favor of the former President Ollanda Humala In the investigation for Financial fraud.
I elaborate on the consequences of the decision declaring that the evidence obtained from the Drousys and My Web Day B systems used in the leniency agreement signed by Odebrecht (similar to effective cooperation in Peru) is indictable in the Brazilian legal system. Regarding the plaintiff (Yoshiyama)”, reads the resolution accessed by Infobae Perú.
Toffoli days invalidates the proof because, according to opinion Supremo Tribunal Federal, they are “incredible”. This is because the aforementioned Brazilian Supreme Court determined that there were flaws in the chain of custody of the data retrieved from the server. Odebrecht structured operations sectorWhere is called 'Box 2′.
In addition to deleting resources received from servers Draucis Y My internet day b, the judge reiterated that carrying out collaborative activities derived from these elements is prohibited in Brazil. It was this ban that prevented it Marcelo Odebrecht, George Parada and other former executives testified in August 2023 at the trial against Ollanda Humala.
In the letter sent by the company Otbrecht Al Third National Collegiate Criminal CourtWho is in charge of investigation HumalaThe company says it could face criminal charges against former executives Brazil If they disobey a court order and appear in action in Peru.
“Failure to comply with the judicial decision issued by the Supreme Federal Court, according to different Brazilian lawyers, represents the practice of a criminal offense for contempt of power,” the letter said.
OtbrechtFurthermore, he proposed that the Peruvian authorities implement a new letter before the Brazilian judge, which states that former directors, when testifying before a Peruvian judge, will not refer to evidence prohibited by the STF.
Despite the resolution that S.T.F Former directors Otbrecht In the trial against Ollanda HumalaHe Third National Collegiate Criminal Court A position has not yet been established: whether or not the judgment of another country's court has consequences for Peruvian justice.
“The big question that the Peruvian courts have not yet answered is whether or not they will agree to extend the consequences of the Brazilian court's rulings, because they may not. (…) That will be the big legal debate,” said the lawyer. Caesar Nagasaki A Infobae Peru.
In a conversation with this media, the former minister Wilfredo PedrazaLawyer HumalaHe indicated they would call the judge's decision Toffoli days While components related to servers Draucis Y My internet day b Subject to assessment in oral examination.
“The problem is very simple: if these experiments are classified as illegal experiments in Brazil, obviously the illegality of an experiment is a universal concept. It should not have any application here (evidence obtained from Drousys and My Web Day B),” he declared.
PetrazaIt also held that the illegal declaration would extend to other defendants in the case, such as the former first lady. Nadine Heredia.
